Protect yourself by learning which downloads are legal, which ones aren’t, and the consequences that come with illegal downloading.
Downloading Do’s and Don’ts:
The RIAA webpage provides a great list of do’s and don’ts of downloading material on the internet. Below are just a few FAQ’s pulled from their site that may be most important to you:
Is uploading music from a CD that you own onto an Internet site for other users to download a violation of copyright law?
Yes. Owning a CD means you own one copy of the music, and the U.S. record industry believes you should be able to make whatever personal use you choose. For example, you may make a compilation recording (on tape or on a CD) to use in the car or while exercising. But it’s a very different matter – and clearly neither legal nor fair – to make a copy of that CD or even one song available on the Internet for others to take.
The sound recording copyright holders own the music itself, and have a number of rights under current federal law that include the right to control the reproduction, distribution, adaptation, and various digital transmissions of their works. Therefore, creating unauthorized MP3 sites by copying sound recordings to a server for other people to download and/or offering such recordings for download is a violation of copyright law. Making tapes or CDs of recordings downloaded from the Internet without permission from the copyright owner is a violation of copyright law. Read more about copyright law.
Isn’t it within my First Amendment right to post recordings to my site for other people to download?
The First Amendment does not grant a right to infringe copyrighted works.
The RIAA and the music industry as a whole are dedicated to protecting the First Amendment rights of Americans, including the rights of artists to be heard, even if their lyrics are offensive to some. If you are interested in learning about First Amendment issues that are currently facing artists, check out the Freedom of Speech section.
Penalties for copyright infringement include civil and criminal penalties. In general, anyone found liable for civil copyright infringement may be ordered to pay either actual damages or “statutory” damages affixed at not less than $750 and not more than $30,000 per work infringed. For “willful” infringement, a court may award up to $150,000 per work infringed. A court can, in its discretion, also assess costs and attorneys’ fees. For details, see Title 17, United States Code, Sections 504, 505.
Willful copyright infringement can also result in criminal penalties, including imprisonment of up to five years and fines of up to $250,000 per offense.
Yes. The question of whether or not you are charging does not impact the answer to whether or not you are violating copyright law. If you don’t hold the copyright, you can’t sell or even give away unauthorized copies of the sound recording without permission. In addition, the No Electronic Theft (“NET”) Act, which amended Section 506 of the Copyright Act, clarified that even if a site barters or trades infringing materials and doesn’t charge or otherwise make a profit there still may even be criminal liability. Additionally, you may face civil liability, including statutory damages of up to $150,000 per copyright infringement, even if you’re just giving away the files.
If a website doesn’t display a copyright notice, is the music still copyrighted or is it okay to reproduce, distribute, or download?
In the U.S., almost every work created privately and originally after March 1, 1989, is copyrighted and protected whether or not it has a notice.
U.S. law may well apply when the uploading and/or downloading takes place in the United States, even if the server is physically located in another country. Additionally, the copyright laws of foreign countries are, in many cases, similar to those in the United States. U.S. trade law allows the Office of the United States Trade Representative to take action against those countries that fail to provide adequate and effective copyright protection and market access.
Is it illegal to link to other sites that have unauthorized sound files, even if my own site doesn’t offer any?
Liability for copyright infringement is not necessarily limited to the persons or entities who created (or encoded) the infringing sound file. In addition to being directly liable for infringing conduct occurring via the site, a linking site may be contributorily or vicariously liable for facilitating copyright infringement occurring at the sites to which it links.
Contributory liability may be found where a person, with knowledge of the infringing activity, induces, causes, or materially contributes to the infringing conduct of another. A link site operator may be liable for contributory infringement by knowingly linking to infringing files.
Vicarious liability may be imposed where an entity has the right and ability to control the activities of the direct infringer and also receives a financial benefit from the infringing activities. Liability may be imposed even if the entity is unaware of the infringing activities. In the case of a linking site, providing direct access to infringing works may show a right and ability to control the activities of the direct infringer and receiving revenue from banner ads may be evidence of a financial benefit.
Legal alternatives for downloading:
UMA procedure for handling unauthorized distribution of copyrighted material
Part 1: The plan to effectively combat copyright infringement
1-1. Link to relevant Web page(s)
University of Maine at Augusta Copyright Site
1-2. What technology-based deterrent(s) have you decided to use?
A vigorous program of accepting and responding to DMCA notices.
1-3. What mechanism(s) are you using to educate your community?
We send an electronic newsletter to all registered students every semester, reminding them to know the institution’s policy related to copyright infringement and that copyright infringement may subject them to civil and criminal penalties. In the newsletter, they are given the link to the institution’s webpage that also includes a summary of the penalties for violating Federal copyright law, as well as a description of the institution’s actions that are taken.
Every semester, we send an email to all registered students, notifying them of the link to the student handbook. In this email, we highlight specific important polices that students need to know and direct them to the chapter in the student handbook pertaining to copyright infringement and that copyright infringement may subject them to civil and criminal penalties. This also has the link to our copyright site.
1-4. What procedures are you using for handling unauthorized distribution of copyrighted material (e.g., monitoring, sanctions, etc.)?
- As a part of its compliance with federal copyright law, The University of Maine at Augusta deploys a procedure to respond to notices of copyright violation by copyright holders. This procedure operates as follows:
- The Digital Millennium Copyright Agent for the University of Maine system requests that the UMA IT staff disable the Internet Protocol (IP) address alleged by the notice to be in violation of federal law.
- One of the IT staff members researches the request and if applicable, disables the (IP) address assigned to the laptop of the alleged violation and notifies the Director of Computer Services.
- The Director of Computer Services then notifies the user or responsible party with an email detailing our procedures. The user must bring the laptop in question to the IT department in either Augusta or Bangor so the IT staff can verify the material has been deleted, in order to regain network access. Students are asked to read the UMA copyright site and are warned what happens upon a second offense.
- Second offenses trigger an automatic referral to the Student Conduct Officer.
1-5. How are you periodically reviewing the plan? What criteria are you using to determine if it is effectively combating copyright infringement?
Our response procedures are continually reviewed for effectiveness and relevance
Part 2: Offering Alternatives
2-1. Link to relevant Web page(s)
2-2. Are you carrying out your own survey of alternatives or linking to one or more lists maintained by others? If the latter, which list(s)?
Linking to: https://www.educause.edu/legalcontent.
2-3. Have you made any special arrangements with one or more content providers to obtain content through legal methods?
Ruckus was used until they went out of business on February 6, 2009.
Part 3: Informing the Community
3-1. Link to relevant Web page(s)
The University of Maine at Augusta Copyright Site includes copyright references and links to copyright issues in education.
3-2. Have you developed your own statement regarding copyright and copyright law in general or are you linking to such statement(s) maintained by others? If the latter, which statement(s)?
UMA developed our own statements.